more like - did anyone not?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_involved_in_the_Gaza_war
Step 3: Initiating the Print Dialogue
Unfortunately, the native iOS Calendar app lacks a direct ‘Print’ function. Therefore, the workaround is to take a screenshot and then print the screenshot.
and for the most part in my recent experience, used car dealers & salespeople
cannot help lying in order to sell a car.
The short answer: you’re not imagining it — the Nikon Z7II does accumulate “virtual” dial turns in P (Flexible Program) when you hit the end of the aperture/shutter range with Auto ISO active.* This is normal behavior for Nikon’s implementation, but it’s undeniably clunky and feels wrong in use.
Below is a clear explanation of why it happens, what’s going on internally, and what you can do to avoid or mitigate it.
When Auto ISO is enabled, Program Shift stops updating once the camera hits a hard exposure boundary (minimum shutter speed, minimum ISO, maximum aperture, etc.). But the camera still counts your dial rotations, even though it can’t change the exposure triangle any further. So when you turn the dial back, you must “rewind” all those stored steps before the camera can resume changing aperture/shutter.
This behavior is confirmed in Nikon documentation and analysis of Flexible Program mode.
Nikon’s P\* mode doesn’t directly rotate through aperture/shutter pairs. Instead, it maintains an internal shift index — a number representing how far you’ve shifted from the default program line.
When you hit a limit (e.g., max aperture), the camera can’t change exposure anymore, but the shift index continues to increment.
This is why the camera “remembers” how many clicks past the limit you turned.
With Auto ISO active, Nikon imposes strict boundaries:
Minimum shutter speed (from Auto ISO settings)
Minimum ISO
Maximum aperture
Maximum shutter speed
Once the camera hits any of these, it refuses to change the other parameters to compensate — a behavior Nikon explicitly documents.
So P\* runs out of valid exposure combinations, but the shift index keeps moving.
Some brands (e.g., Canon) clamp the shift so that turning past the limit does nothing and does not accumulate.
Nikon does not.
This is why you must unwind the dial to get back into the valid range.
It’s not classified as a bug — Nikon considers it normal behavior for Flexible Program with Auto ISO. But many users consider it a usability flaw.
This gives P\* more room before hitting the wall.
Try: Menu → Photo Shooting → ISO sensitivity settings → Minimum shutter speed
With fixed ISO, P\* works exactly as expected and does not prematurely hit limits. Nikon documentation confirms this difference.
If you want:
Aperture control → A mode + Auto ISO
Shutter control → S mode + Auto ISO
These modes behave more predictably with Auto ISO.
This avoids the P\* dead-end while keeping exposure flexible.
You’ve correctly identified a real quirk of Nikon’s P\* implementation: the camera keeps counting dial turns even when it can’t change exposure, forcing you to unwind them later.
It’s not fixable in settings, but you can avoid it by adjusting Auto ISO behavior or using A/S modes when Auto ISO is essential.
If Program Shift behavior is important to you — especially avoiding Nikon’s “dial overshoot” problem — then:
Fuji is also clean, but Program Shift is less central to their design.
It’s a legacy of how Nikon DSLRs implemented P\*
https://github.com/processing/p5.js/wiki/Getting-started-with-WebGL-in-p5
why would you force everyone to use mostly negative z values everywhere? (the history of coordinate system choices for graphics is forever full of strange stuff.)
The short answer: Steam is warning you because something in your app’s configuration still counts as “changed but not submitted,” even if you already published a build. This usually happens when the store page or metadata has pending edits — not the build itself.
Below is a clear, practical breakdown of what causes this and how to fix it.
Steam distinguishes between content builds and store metadata. Publishing a build does not automatically publish store‑page changes.
The warning appears when any of the following still have unsent edits:
Steam’s documentation confirms that publishing builds and publishing store metadata are separate actions. Steamworks
Each item below starts with a Guided Link so you can jump directly into the next step if needed.
Use these Guided Links to jump to the relevant checks:
This happens occasionally due to Steamworks caching.
Try:
If you tell me:
…I can walk you through the exact place to look.
Which part of Steamworks is showing the warning — the Store Page editor, the Publish tab, or the Builds page?
> Your Google Pixel Android system update may pause due to sleep settings or battery-saving features, which limit background activity. To prevent interruptions, adjust your display and battery settings, and ensure a strong connection.
fuck the user
fuck the user
fuck the user
fuck the user
fuck the user fuck the user fuck the user
fuck the user fuck the user fuck the user
fuck the user
fuck the user
news at 11
the core idea might be ok, heaven knows it has won out, but the ux kills me every other day.
pretty much everything online about ecommerce is dog shyte ui ux.
trying to ship a used computer monitor.
freaking nightmare of stupidities.
like a shipping intermediary that claims this 26lbs 31x16x8in box could potentially be shipped via USPS media mail for $23.22
just blatant outright transparently stupid-rock-dumb.
oh and they somehow broke the most basic parts of gui in a web browser, too.
oh and are full of random bugs and unresponsive ui.
"shipstation" more like "shytestation" if you know what i mean.
let alone the superweasel terms and conditions.
pirateship sucks. easyship sucks.
c'est la vie.
Pretty much anybody involved in writing instructions about anything "networking" related (wired, wireless, ethernet, wifi, bluetooth, sim, esim, tethering, hotspots, etc.) is at least an idiot, if not an assh*le.
Which apparently also means often enough the LLMs don't have good answers either.
Remember back when we had "tech writers"? Who actually knew what they were doing? Who had a clue at all about what was required for decent documentation?